Difference between revisions of "Crowdsourcing Bibliography"
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
General articles | General articles | ||
| − | + | * '''Schenk, E. & Guittard, C. (2011). [https://www.cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2011-1-page-93.htm Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices]'''. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 7(1), 93-107. doi:10.3917/jie.007.0093. | |
| − | # Simperl, E. (2015). [https://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.9948/ How to Use Crowdsourcing Effectively: Guidelines and Examples]. LIBER Quarterly, 25(1), 18–39. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9948 | + | |
| − | + | <blockquote>According to this article, what we are doing can be characterized as a form of "content crowdsourcing" (CS) that they refer to as "Integrative Crowdsourcing": | |
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>Integrative CS will be relevant when the client firm seeks to build data or information bases. Therefore Integrative CS is a form of content Crowdsourcing. While gathering information or data at an individual’s level can be unproblematic, building a data base generally requires significant amounts of resources. '''The rationale of integrative CS therefore lies in the cost of building large data or information bases.''' Since individuals within the crowd are heterogeneous, Crowdsourcing enables the client firm to gather a variety of contents. '''The firm seeking to implement integrative CS should however be aware of integration issues. Data or information stemming from various origins might be incompatible or redundant if no precaution is taken. Precautions include the definition of a data format and the sound selection of data sources. ''' [''Emphasis added'']</blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are other relevant sections of this paper including: | ||
| + | |||
| + | # A way to distinguish 1992 data transcription tasks and the more complex cognitive efforts required for data extraction from the written articles from the 1961 season. See these sections of the paper: | ||
| + | ## Crowdsourcing of simple tasks | ||
| + | ## Crowdsourcing of complex tasks | ||
| + | # Discussion of incentives in this section: Discussion: benefits and pitfalls | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Simperl, E. (2015). [https://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.9948/ How to Use Crowdsourcing Effectively: Guidelines and Examples]'''. LIBER Quarterly, 25(1), 18–39. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9948 | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>This article has a great Guide to Crowdsourcing!!! (it's a subsection near the end of the article)</blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Brabham, D.C. (2013). Crowdsourcing (book)'''. MIT Press. Available as an [http://library.ua.edu/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=7158218 ebook through UA Libraries] | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>This should be one of our "go to" resources. It's a short book. This quote is indicative of its usefulness: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>Crowdsourcing is a problem-solving model because it enables an organization confronted with a problem and desiring a goal state to scale up the task environment dra-matically and enlarge the solver base by opening up the problem to an online community through the Internet.</blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | This quote is from Chapter 1 of the book | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Terras, M.M. (2016). [http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1447269/1/MTerras_Crowdsourcing%20in%20Digital%20Humanities_Final.pdf Crowdsourcing in the Digital Humanities]''' In Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., and Unsworth, J. (eds), (2016) "A New Companion to Digital Humanities", (p. 420 –439). Wiley-Blackwell. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>This chapter has a section that is a nice background discussion of historical document transcription.</blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 16 June 2019
Data extraction examples:
- Brohan, Philip (n.d.) New Uses for Old Weather
- Old Weather (website)
- Weather Rescue (website)
General articles
- Schenk, E. & Guittard, C. (2011). Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 7(1), 93-107. doi:10.3917/jie.007.0093.
According to this article, what we are doing can be characterized as a form of "content crowdsourcing" (CS) that they refer to as "Integrative Crowdsourcing":
Integrative CS will be relevant when the client firm seeks to build data or information bases. Therefore Integrative CS is a form of content Crowdsourcing. While gathering information or data at an individual’s level can be unproblematic, building a data base generally requires significant amounts of resources. The rationale of integrative CS therefore lies in the cost of building large data or information bases. Since individuals within the crowd are heterogeneous, Crowdsourcing enables the client firm to gather a variety of contents. The firm seeking to implement integrative CS should however be aware of integration issues. Data or information stemming from various origins might be incompatible or redundant if no precaution is taken. Precautions include the definition of a data format and the sound selection of data sources. [Emphasis added]
There are other relevant sections of this paper including:
- A way to distinguish 1992 data transcription tasks and the more complex cognitive efforts required for data extraction from the written articles from the 1961 season. See these sections of the paper:
- Crowdsourcing of simple tasks
- Crowdsourcing of complex tasks
- Discussion of incentives in this section: Discussion: benefits and pitfalls
- Simperl, E. (2015). How to Use Crowdsourcing Effectively: Guidelines and Examples. LIBER Quarterly, 25(1), 18–39. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.9948
This article has a great Guide to Crowdsourcing!!! (it's a subsection near the end of the article)
- Brabham, D.C. (2013). Crowdsourcing (book). MIT Press. Available as an ebook through UA Libraries
This should be one of our "go to" resources. It's a short book. This quote is indicative of its usefulness:
Crowdsourcing is a problem-solving model because it enables an organization confronted with a problem and desiring a goal state to scale up the task environment dra-matically and enlarge the solver base by opening up the problem to an online community through the Internet.
This quote is from Chapter 1 of the book
- Terras, M.M. (2016). Crowdsourcing in the Digital Humanities In Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., and Unsworth, J. (eds), (2016) "A New Companion to Digital Humanities", (p. 420 –439). Wiley-Blackwell.
This chapter has a section that is a nice background discussion of historical document transcription.
