Difference between revisions of "We were right about the same we don't have a name for those two party. [IndianCountry/Reservation] (Q6041)"

From Wikibase.slis.ua.edu
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(‎Created claim: time code begin string (P79): 00:10:33.320, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1562814050201)
(‎Added [en] label: We were right about the same we don't have a name for those two party. [IndianCountry/Reservation], #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1563412838174)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
label / enlabel / en
-
We were right about the same we don't have a name for those two party.
+
We were right about the same we don't have a name for those two party. [IndianCountry/Reservation]
Property / time code end string
 +
00:11:35.159
Property / time code end string: 00:11:35.159 / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / segment hash
 +
26e44c7d6b14203bc0b77894e5a61fcc
Property / segment hash: 26e44c7d6b14203bc0b77894e5a61fcc / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / follows
 +
Property / follows: An old conservative said much the same thing but in a less polite terms he thought that the federal government dominated the Navajo Council is there now. [IndianCountry/Reservation] / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / followed by
 +
Property / followed by: As I mentioned before this money is not spent without approval of the secretary of interior. [IndianCountry/Reservation] / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / named entity
 +
Property / named entity: Morris McCain / rank
 +
Normal rank
Property / named entity
 +
Property / named entity: Navajo Nation Council / rank
 +
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 01:20, 18 July 2019

Transcript segment from the AAFP NET episode "Future for the Reservation Indian" (1957)
Language Label Description Also known as
English
We were right about the same we don't have a name for those two party. [IndianCountry/Reservation]
Transcript segment from the AAFP NET episode "Future for the Reservation Indian" (1957)

    Statements